Free Websites at

900p Vs 1080p Gaming Performance Computers

900p Vs 1080p Gaming Performance Computers

900p vs 1080p gaming performance computers


900p Vs 1080p Gaming Performance Computers ->


















































900p Vs 1080p Gaming Performance Computers



4k is pointless unless you own a 70" 4k tv or a 4k monitor DaBadGuyCR, Oct 11, 2014 defender2142 Super Star Joined: Mar 26, 2009 Messages: 75,499 Date Posted: Oct 11, 2014 #14 TheGreatEscape said: ↑ It's funny how some console gamers will try to rationalize inferior hardware/graphics. LOL Yeah I fucked that up. but on my 60in tv, 720p is unwatchable in comparison.Click to expand. I wish there was a way to have a different stream setting for each profile. I am interested in MCC, Halo 5, Crackdown, Sunset Overdrive and other Xbone exclusives.Click to expand. 8 answers Last reply Aug 29, 2015 Best Answer Aug 29, 2015 . Plus gaming at 1920x1200 would sure work your 460s, I know it would do to mine.=p SaltyMeatballsMember Since: December 21, 2009Posts: 25162SaltyMeatballsFollowForum Posts: 25162Followed by: 0Reviews: 5 Stacks: 0Forum Karma: 0#15 Posted by SaltyMeatballs (25162 posts) - 5 years, 5 months ago[QUOTE="jedikevin2"][QUOTE="oajlu"]what games are you playing? i noticed no difference on always run 60fpsat whatever setting I choose according to fraps.LoxCropek sounds like you have Vsync on. and newer games loose performance on higher res. Solved From 900p to 1080p: 20 FPS less? .


I would have paid an extra $100 for a stronger system on both sides. 1080p vs 720p on a laptop is not really noticeable. I normally run 1440p on my computer to get 60fps on a lot of games. Never got into Dark Souls (played it though) and single player only games don't do much for me anymore, I need co-op/multiplayer or I get bored really quickly. LoxCropekMember Since: July 23, 2008Posts: 3550LoxCropekFollowForum Posts: 3550Followed by: 0Reviews: 25 Stacks: 0Forum Karma: 0#1 Posted by LoxCropek (3550 posts) - 5 years, 5 months agoHow big would be the performance hit going from 1600x900 (1,440,000 pixels) to 1920x1080 (2,073,600 pixels)? ionusXMember Since: September 26, 2009Posts: 25755ionusXFollowForum Posts: 25755Followed by: 0Reviews: 8 Stacks: 0Forum Karma: 0#2 Posted by ionusX (25755 posts) - 5 years, 5 months agosignificant 1080p is always a hgue leap and really burns ur preformance.


Game of the Week. marcongreen B-B-BACON, B-B-B-B-BACON! Joined: Feb 28, 2013 Messages: 35,691 Location: Mother Russia Date Posted: Oct 11, 2014 #4 lmao this console peasantry. constant 60 fps (???).Dragon Age 2 the same as Witcher.Newer gamesOn Crysis 3 though, I get a 10 fps drop from 900p to 1080p. I went from 1440x900 to 1920x1080 running a GTX570 and honestly didnt lose that much fps, even on demanding games like Crysis and Metro 2033 mitu123Member Since: August 20, 2006Posts: 154987mitu123FollowForum Posts: 154987Followed by: 0Reviews: 32 Stacks: 0Forum Karma: 0#12 Posted by mitu123 (154987 posts) - 5 years, 5 months agoI want to upgrade from my gateway 22' 1680x1050, and I'm leaning more towards getting a 1900x1200 display since 1080p doesn't seem like that big of a leap. You mean there will be a huge drop of fps? Will it be something like from 50 to 20 on FXAA? MultiCofyAug 29, 2015, 8:12 PM NikaYT said: CTurbo said: Yes there will be a big hit in fps if you switch to 1080p. oajluMember Since: May 19, 2006Posts: 2652oajluFollowForum Posts: 2652Followed by: 0Reviews: 16 Stacks: 0Forum Karma: 0#5 Posted by oajlu (2652 posts) - 5 years, 5 months agowhat games are you playing? i noticed no difference on always run 60fpsat whatever setting I choose according to fraps. Click to expand. but when I back up to 2 foot i can't. BIGBISCUIT, Oct 11, 2014 darkheartlessriku Stay Gold.


darkheartlessriku, Oct 11, 2014 DaBadGuyCR likes this. illpaisa just the tip Joined: Aug 13, 2007 Messages: 71,233 Location: TO Date Posted: Oct 11, 2014 #42 DaBadGuyCR said: ↑ I'm a PC gamer as well. DaBadGuyCR said: ↑ I normally run 1440p on my computer to get 60fps on a lot of games. Hardware will be much cheaper to tdo that next gen. Amen to that everyday, I'll take shittier textures over shittier draw distances. 3DS DS iOS PC PS3 PS4 PSP Switch Vita Wii U Xbox 360 Xbox One MoreSystems Android Ouya Arcade PlayStation Dreamcast PlayStation 2 Game Boy Advance Saturn GameCube Super Nintendo Genesis Wii NES Xbox Nintendo 64 And 96 More. Of course theres no real 100% accurate answer for everyone, as every eye is different, and each individual perceives and elaborates details in a different way. I had to lower some settings to play.Tomb Raider the same as CrysisWatch Dogs I get only a 5 fps drop.To conclude. The only place you can tell is in the second set of pictures.


I would put physics options at the bottom in that case though. Moving up resolutions can be significant. caracol101Sep 24, 2014, 9:08 PM no, if you put it in 1080p the card should work 150% faster so you actually gain performance, hammer your gpu because its broken chromicSep 24, 2014, 9:09 PM 1600x900 1.44million pixels1920x1080 2.050 mill. You just spent hundreds of dollars on a "next-gen" console that can't even do 1080p let alone 1080p/60fps. Tweet Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next > DaBadGuyCR Another Horrible Post Joined: Feb 22, 2007 Messages: 19,529 Date Posted: Oct 11, 2014 #1 Advertisement So are the same? No but is it a noticeable differences will in action? No. You will have a FPS hit regardless of game you play. I love my xbox one and I like my PS4, but obviously under the hood these consoles should have more power with how cheap parts are these days to get 1080p/60fps constantly.

total recall 2012 brrip 720p subtitles torrent
victorious s04e01 720p web camera
megafactories lego 720p vs 960h
hd 1080p wallpaper desktop background nature
hd songs 1080p blu ray tamil new year 2016
blu ray hindi songs 1080p 2015 abstract
crowning the scalchop king 720p or 1080i
galaxy w 720p video meaning
midori no hibi 720p mega
gtr hd wallpaper 1080p a-10